Accuracy Assessment | Recommendation | Basis | |
BP | Medaval | None | Although equivalence to another device is claimed, this has not been tested to MDR requirements. |
BP | BIHS (UK and IRL) | Professional use | Manufacturer declaration of equivalence to the Dinamap Procare 100 |
BP | ESH (Europe) | Professional use | The BIHS recommendation, despite the absence, at the time, of the scientific evidence required by the same authors' criteria. |
Legend: B BIHS Derivative, P Stride Equivalence
Note: This is a provisional list, as equivalence according to EU Regulation 2017/745 (e.g. MEDDEV 2.7/1 rev 4) is not proven. Accordingly, these publications are not used in the assessment of star-ratings.
Dinamap ProCare (DPC 100X-EN)
de Greeff A, Reggiori F, Shennan AH. Clinical assessment of the DINAMAP ProCare monitor in an adult population according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol. Blood Press Monit. 2007 Feb;12(1):51-55. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3280858b73. PMID: 17303988.
BHS:1993 - Pass (A/A) General population
SP10:1992 - Pass General population
Dinamap ProCare 100
Reinders A, Reggiori F, Shennan AH. Validation of the DINAMAP ProCare blood pressure device according to the international protocol in an adult population. Blood Press Monit. 2006 Oct;11(5):293-6. PMID: 16932038.
ESH-IP:2002 - Pass General population
Dinamap ProCare 200
Lee CG, Park HM, Shin HJ, Moon JS, Hong YM, Kim NS, Ha IS, Chang MJ, Oh KW. Validation study of the Dinamap ProCare 200 upper arm blood pressure monitor in children and adolescents. Korean J Pediatr. 2011 Nov;54(11):463-9. Epub: 2011 Nov 30. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2011.54.11.463. PMID: 22253643. Available from: PMC3254892.
ESH-IP:2010 - Fail Children and adolescents (n=45)