Accuracy Assessment | Recommendation | Basis | |
BG | Medaval | Not recommended | This device has not been clinically validated. |
Vandersluis S, Kabali C, Djalalov S, Gajic-Veljanoski O, Wells D and Holubowich C on behalf of Health Quality Ontario. Continuous Monitoring of Glucose for Type 1 Diabetes: A Health Technology Assessment. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2018 Feb 21;18(2):1-160. PMID: 29541282. Available from: PMC5836597. eCollection 2018.
The publication describes the use of the Dexcom G4 Platinum in a scientific study.
Freckmann G, Link M, Pleus S, Westhoff A, Kamecke U, Haug C. Measurement Performance of Two Continuous Tissue Glucose Monitoring Systems Intended for Replacement of Blood Glucose Monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Aug;20(8):541-549. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0105. PMID: 30067410. Available from: PMC6080122.
The publication evaluates the performance of the Dexcom G5 Mobile, though not in a formal validation.
Approximately 25% of results showed differences from reference results exceeding 15 mg/dL, at glucose concentration below 100 mg/dL, or exceeding 15%, at glucose concentration above 100 mg/dL, at times of therapeutic decisions.
Ólafsdóttir AF, Andelin M, Saeed A, Sofizadeh S, Hamoodi H, Jansson PA, Lind M. Performance of Dexcom G5 and FreeStyle Libre sensors tested simultaneously in people with type 1 or 2 diabetes and advanced chronic kidney disease. World J Clin Cases. 2022 Aug 6;10(22):7794-7807. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.7794. PMID: 36158498. Available from: PMC9372866.
Measurements from the Dexcom G5 Mobile are compared to those from HemoCue Glucose 201 DM RT, though not in a formal validation.
The Dexcom G5 had a similar accuracy in people with diabetes and advanced CKD as in people with diabetes without advanced CKD.