IEM Mobil-O-Graph NG
The technology used in the IEM Mobil-O-Graph NG, to measure blood pressure, has passed in three clinical validation studies, in general populations, according to recognised standard protocols, as published in peer-reviewed publications.
| Accuracy Assessment | Recommendation | Basis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medaval | ★★ Recommendation | Recent clinical validation; older protocol; multiple clinical validations | ||
| BIHS (UK and IRL) | Published evidence | |||
| ESH (Europe) | ABPM | Published evidence | ||
Jones CR, Taylor K, Chowienczyk P, Poston L, Shennan AH. A validation of the Mobil O Graph (version 12) ambulatory blood pressure monitor. Blood Press Monit. 2000 Aug;5(4):233-8. PMID: 11035866.
BHS:1993 - Pass (B/A) General population
SP10:1992 - Pass General population
Franssen PM, Imholz BP. Evaluation of the Mobil-O-Graph new generation ABPM device using the ESH criteria. Blood Press Monit. 2010 Aug;15(4):229-31. PMID: 20658764.
ESH-IP:2002 - Pass General population
Weiß W, Tölle M, Zidek W, van der Giet M. Validation of the mobil-O-Graph: 24 h-blood pressure measurement device. Blood Press Monit. 2010 Aug;15(4):225-8. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328338892f. PMID: 20216407.
BHS:1993 - Pass General population
Weiss W, Gohlisch C, Harsch-Gladisch C, Tölle M, Zidek W, van der Giet M. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device. Blood Press Monit. 2012 Jun;17(3):128-31. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328353ff63. PMID: 22561735.
Measurements from the IEM Mobil-O-Graph NG are compared to those from the Sphygmocor, though not in a formal validation.
Kallem RR, Meyers KE, Sawinski DL, Townsend RR. A comparison of two ambulatory blood pressure monitors worn at the same time. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 May;15(5):321-5. Epub: 2013 Apr 8. doi: 10.1111/jch.12098. PMID: 23614845. Available from: onlinelibrary.wiley.com.
Measurements from the IEM Mobil-O-Graph NG are compared to those from the SL-90207, though not in a formal validation.
Kallem RR, Meyers KE, Cucchiara AJ, Sawinski DL, Townsend RR. Blood pressure variability of two ambulatory blood pressure monitors. Blood Press Monit. 2014 Apr;19(2):98-102. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000019. PMID: 24374722.
Measurements from the IEM Mobil-O-Graph NG are compared to those from the SL-90207, though not in a formal validation.
Sarafidis PA, Lazaridis AA, Imprialos KP, Georgianos PI, Avranas KA, Protogerou AD, Doumas MN, Athyros VG, Karagiannis AI. A comparison study of brachial blood pressure recorded with Spacelabs 90217A and Mobil-O-Graph NG devices under static and ambulatory conditions. J Hum Hypertens. 2016 Dec;30(12):742-9. Epub: 2016 Mar 3. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2016.11. PMID: 26935286.
Measurements from the IEM Mobil-O-Graph NG are compared to those from the SL-90207A and a standard mercury sphygmomanometer, though not in a formal validation.
