🏠
📞  +353 1 6643768
 
📧  info@medaval.ie
IEM Mobil-O-Graph NG
Manufacturer:
Industrielle Entwicklung Medizintechnik und Vertriebsgesellschaft GmbH (IEM), Cockerillstraße 69, D-52222 Stolberg, GERMANY.
Measuring functions:
Blood pressure
Primary Client Use:
Intended for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
Measurement Site:
Upper Arm
Measurement Occurrence:
Intermittent measurements at specified intervals or times
Availability:
Available Currently
Availability according to Countries or Regions:
Ireland
Device Manual:
Description:
The IEM Mobil-O-Graph NG is an ambulatory blood pressure monitor. Its blood pressure measurement technology has been proven to be accurate, with a 1-star Medaval rating. Blood pressure measurements are taken from the upper arm and it is intended for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Assessment:
The technology used in the IEM Mobil-O-Graph NG, to measure blood pressure, has passed in two clinical validation studies, in general populations, according to recognised standard protocols, as published in peer-reviewed publications.
Recommendations:
Accuracy AssessmentRecommendationBasis
Medaval Recommendation Older clinical validation; older protocol; multiple clinical validations
BIHS (UK and IRL) ABPM Published evidence
ESH (Europe) ABPM Published evidence
Stride BP ABPM for adults Published evidence
Device Family:
Cardioline Walk200bB , IEM Mobil-O-Graph NGB , Medset Scanlight-IIIB , Hillrom ABPM 7100B
Legend: B BIHS Derivative
Validation Publications:

Franssen PM, Imholz BP. Evaluation of the Mobil-O-Graph new generation ABPM device using the ESH criteria. Blood Press Monit. 2010 Aug;15(4):229-31. PMID: 20658764.

ESH-IP:2002 - Pass General population

Weiß W, Tölle M, Zidek W, van der Giet M. Validation of the mobil-O-Graph: 24 h-blood pressure measurement device. Blood Press Monit. 2010 Aug;15(4):225-8. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328338892f. PMID: 20216407.

BHS:1993 - Pass General population

Relevant Publications:

Weiss W, Gohlisch C, Harsch-Gladisch C, Tölle M, Zidek W, van der Giet M. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device. Blood Press Monit. 2012 Jun;17(3):128-31. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328353ff63. PMID: 22561735.

Measurements from the IEM Mobil-O-Graph NG are compared to those from the Atcor Sphygmocor, though not in a formal validation.

Kallem RR, Meyers KE, Sawinski DL, Townsend RR. A comparison of two ambulatory blood pressure monitors worn at the same time. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 May;15(5):321-5. Epub: 2013 Apr 8. doi: 10.1111/jch.12098. PMID: 23614845. Available from: onlinelibrary.wiley.com.

Measurements from the IEM Mobil-O-Graph NG are compared to those from the Spacelabs SL-90207, though not in a formal validation.

Kallem RR, Meyers KE, Cucchiara AJ, Sawinski DL, Townsend RR. Blood pressure variability of two ambulatory blood pressure monitors. Blood Press Monit. 2014 Apr;19(2):98-102. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000019. PMID: 24374722.

Measurements from the IEM Mobil-O-Graph NG are compared to those from the Spacelabs SL-90207, though not in a formal validation.

Sarafidis PA, Lazaridis AA, Imprialos KP, Georgianos PI, Avranas KA, Protogerou AD, Doumas MN, Athyros VG, Karagiannis AI. A comparison study of brachial blood pressure recorded with Spacelabs 90217A and Mobil-O-Graph NG devices under static and ambulatory conditions. J Hum Hypertens. 2016 Dec;30(12):742-9. Epub: 2016 Mar 3. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2016.11. PMID: 26935286.

Measurements from the IEM Mobil-O-Graph NG are compared to those from the SL-90207A and a standard mercury sphygmomanometer, though not in a formal validation.

Gotzmann M, Hogeweg M, Seibert FS, Rohn BJ, Bergbauer M, Babel N, Bauer F, Mügge A, Westhoff TH. Accuracy of fully automated oscillometric central aortic blood pressure measurement techniques. J Hypertens. 2020 Feb;38(2):235-242. Epub: 2019 Sep 9. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002237. PMID: 31503132.

Measurements from the IEM Mobil-O-Graph NG are compared to those from the Atcor SphygmoCor XCEL, though not in a formal validation.