Accuracy Assessment | Recommendation | Basis | |
BG | Medaval | ★★★ Recommendation | Recent clinical validation; recent protocol; multiple clinical validations |
BG | TÜV Rheinland Nederland | General use | Unpublished internal data |
BG | MDR Criteria | Self-measurement and professional use | Published evidence |
Consumer Body | Year(s) | Level | Comment | |
BG | Choice (Australia) | Latest: 2019 | A | |
BG | Amazon Best Sellers (US) | Latest: 2019 | B (3.6 / 5) |
Robinson CS, Sharp P. Tighter accuracy standards within point-of-care blood glucose monitoring: how six commonly used systems compare. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 May 1;6(3):547-54. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600309. PMID: 22768885.
15197:2003 - Pass General population
CLSI:2002 - Pass General population
Freckmann G, Schmid C, Baumstark A, Pleus S, Link M, Haug C. System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Sep 1;6(5):1060-75. PMID: 23063032. Available from: PMC3570840.
15197:2003 - Pass General population (Note: Maltose dependent test strip)
15197:2013 - Pass General population (Note: Maltose dependent test strip)
15197:2003 - Pass General population (Note: Maltose independent test strip)
15197:2013 - Pass General population (Note: Maltose independent test strip)
Pleus S, Schmid C, Link M, Baumstark A, Haug C, Stolberg E, Freckmann G. Accuracy assessment of two novel systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose following ISO 15197:2013. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Jul;8(4):906-8. Epub: 2015 Ma5 25. doi: 10.1177/1932296814536030. PMID: 24876447. Available from: PMC4764206.
15197:2013 - Pass General population
Parwaiz M, Lunt H, Florkowski CM, Logan FJ, Irons L, Perwick C, Frampton CM, Moore MP. Assessment of glucose meter performance at the antenatal diabetes clinic: exploration of patient-related and pre-analytical factors. Ann Clin Biochem. 2014 Jan 5;51(Pt 1):47-53. Epub: 2013 Sep 3. doi: 10.1177/0004563213487893. PMID: 24003257.
15197:2013 - Pass General population
Huang TY, Chang HW, Tsao MF, Chuang SM, Ni CC, Sue JW, Lin HC, Hsu CT. Evaluation of accuracy of FAD-GDH- and mutant Q-GDH-based blood glucose monitors in multi-patient populations. Clin Chim Acta. 2014 Jun 10;433:28-33. Epub: 2014 Mar 5. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.02.023. PMID: 24613515.
15197:2013 - Pass General population
Wide range of ages and diabetic conditions.
Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Jendrike N, Rittmeyer D, Pleus S, Haug C. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in the Hands of Intended Users and Trained Personnel Based on ISO 15197 Requirements. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Apr;19(4):246-54. Epub: 2017 Feb 22. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0341. PMID: 28225633.
15197:2013 General population (Note: Results not in Abstract)
Chen H, Yao Q, Dong Y, Tang Z, Li R, Cai B, Wang R, Chen Q. The accuracy evaluation of four blood glucose monitoring systems according to ISO 15197:2003 and ISO 15197:2013 criteria. Prim Care Diabetes. 2019 Jun;13(3):252-258. Epub: 2019 Feb 13. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.12.010. PMID: 30770203.
15197:2003 - Pass General population
15197:2013 - Pass General population
SKUP. Report from the evaluation SKUP/2011/93: Accu-Chek Performa (Roche Diagnostics), a system for blood glucose measurement. Bergen, Norway: SKUP; 2011. 49 p. Available from: skup.org.
15197:2003 - Pass General population
Perera NJ, Molyneaux L, Constantino MI, McGill M, Yue DK, Twigg SM, Ross GP. Suboptimal performance of blood glucose meters in an antenatal diabetes clinic. Diabetes Care. 2011 Feb;34(2):335-337. Epub: 2011 Jan 7. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1457. PMID: 21216849. Available from: PMC3024344.
The publication evaluates the performance of the Roche Accu-Chek Performa, though not in a formal validation.
Thompson H, Chan H, Logan FJ, Heenan HF, Taylor L, Murray C, Florkowski CM, Frampton CM, Lunt H. A glucose meter evaluation co-designed with both health professional and consumer input. NZ Med J. 2013 Nov 22;126(1386):90-7. doi: .. PMID: 24316996.
Measurements from the Roche Accu-Chek Performa are compared to those from the i-Sens CareSens N POP, though not in a formal validation.
Ceriotti F, Kaczmarek E, Guerra E, Mastrantonio F, Lucarelli F, Valgimigli F, Mosca A. Comparative performance assessment of point-of-care testing devices for measuring glucose and ketones at the patient bedside. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Mar;9(2):268-77. Epub: 2014 Dec 17. doi: 10.1177/1932296814563351. PMID: 25519295. Available from: PMC4604596.
The publication evaluates the performance of the Roche Accu-Chek Performa, though not in a formal validation.
The interferences assessed included acetoacetate, acetaminophen, ascorbic acid, galactose, maltose, uric acid, and sodium. The accuracy of Accu-Chek glucose measurements was affected by haematocrit, by ascorbic acid, and significantly by galactose.
Demircik F, Ramljak S, Hermanns I, Pfützner A, Pfützner A. Evaluation of Hematocrit Interference With MyStar Extra and Seven Competitive Devices J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Mar;9(2):262-267. Epub: 2014 Dec 30. doi: 10.1177/1932296814565790. PMID: 25549636. Available from: PMC4604595.
Good accuracy but potential haematocrit influence.