Accuracy Assessment | Recommendation | Basis | |
BP | Medaval | None | When an evaluation is carried out using a non-standard protocol, no inference can be made on accuracy based on a standard protocol. |
Fitzgerald DJ, O'Callaghan WG, O'Malley K, O'Brien ET. Accuracy of the London School of Hygiene and Remler M2000 sphygmomanometers. Clin Sci (Lond). 1981 Dec;61(Suppl 7):399s-401s. PMID: 7318344. Available from: www.clinsci.org.
Ad Hoc protocol - Pass General population (Note: Hawksley Random-Zero as reference)
Pre standard protocol
Fitzgerald DJ, O'Callaghan WG, McQuaid R, O'Malley K, O'Brien E. Accuracy and reliability of two indirect ambulatory blood pressure recorders: Remler M2000 and Cardiodyne Sphygmolog. Br Heart J. 1982 Dec;48(6):572-9. PMID: 7171405. Available from: PMC482751.
Ad Hoc protocol General population (Note: LSHTM Rose Box as reference (n=12))
Ad Hoc protocol General population (Note: Hawksley Random-Zero as reference (n=35))
Ad Hoc protocol General population (Note: intra-arterial measurements as reference (n=23))
Pre standard protocol. Overall favourable recommendation.
Beevers DG, Bloxham CA, Backhouse CI, Lim CC, Watson RD. The Remler M2000 semi-automatic blood pressure recorder. Br Heart J. 1979 Sep;42(3):366. PMID: 508463. Available from: PMC482165. Letter.
Measurements from the Remler M2000 are compared to those from the LSHTM Rose Box, the Hawksley Random-Zero and intra-arterial measurements, though not in a formal validation.
Cowan R, Sokolow M, Perloff D. The Remler ambulatory blood pressure recording system: Accuracy and reliability. Br Heart J. 1980 Jun;43(6):715-6. PMID: 18610278. Available from: PMC482779. Letter.
Measurements from the Remler M2000 are compared to those from a standard mercury sphygmomanometer, though not in a formal validation.
Bachmann K, Bäuerlein G. Ambulatory monitoring of arterial blood pressure. Comparison between blood pressure measurements obtained with the Remler M 2000 portable recorder and by radiotelemetry under laboratory conditions and during everyday activities. Biotelem Patient Monit. 1981;8(1-2):47-55. PMID: 7295921.
Measurements from the Remler M2000 are compared to those from radiotelemetry recordings in 21 subjects, though not in a formal validation.
Gould BA, Hornung RS, Kieso HA, Altman DG, Cashman PM, Raftery EB. Evaluation of the Remler M2000 blood pressure recorder. Comparison with intraarterial blood pressure recordings both at hospital and at home. Hypertension. 1984 Mar-Apr;6(2 Pt 1):209-15. PMID: 6724663. Available from: hyper.ahajournals.org.
Measurements from the Remler M2000 are compared to those from intra-arterial measurements, though not in a formal validation.
Brennan M, Keenan M, Atkins N, Mee F, O’Brien E. A computer programme to store and analyse ambulatory blood pressure data for the Remler M 2000 recorder. In: ISAM 1985, Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium of Ambulatory Monitoring. Eds: C. Dal Palu and A.C. Pessina. Italy: Cleup Editore; 1986. p. 105-122.
The publication describes the use of the Remler M2000 in a scientific study.