Accuracy Assessment | Recommendation | Basis | |
BG | Medaval | ★★★ Recommendation | Recent clinical validation; recent protocol; multiple clinical validations |
BG | TÜV SÜD (DE) | General use | Unpublished internal data |
BG | MDR Criteria | Self-measurement | Published evidence |
Dunseath GJ, Bright D, Luzio SD. Comparative Accuracy Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Meter With Novel Hematocrit Correction Technology, With Three Currently Used Commercially Available Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 May;13(3):568-574. Epub: 2019 Jan 9. doi: 10.1177/1932296818821389. PMID: 30623673. Available from: PMC6501526.
15197:2013 - Pass General population (Note: Modified protocol: Single batch of test strips only. Some hematocrit associated bias noted.)
Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Jendrike N, Mende J, Schauer S, Link M, Pleus S, Haug C. Impact of Two Different Reference Measurement Procedures on Apparent System Accuracy of 18 CE-Marked Current-Generation Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Sep;16(5):1076-1088. Epub: 2020 Aug 19. doi: 10.1177/1932296820948873. PMID: 32814455. Available from: PMC9445332.
15197:2013 - Pass General population
15197:2013 - Pass General population