Accuracy Assessment | Recommendation | Basis | |
BG | Medaval | Not recommended | This device has failed a clinical validation. |
Leelarathna L, Nodale M, Allen JM, Elleri D, Kumareswaran K, Haidar A, Caldwell K, Wilinska ME, Acerini CL, Evans ML, Murphy HR, Dunger DB, Hovorka R. Evaluating the accuracy and large inaccuracy of two continuous glucose monitoring systems. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Feb;15(2):143-9. Epub: 2012 Dec 20. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0245. PMID: 23256605. Available from: PMC3558677.
15197:2003 - Fail Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Valgimigli F, Lucarelli F, Scuffi C, Morandi S, Sposato I. Evaluating the clinical accuracy of GlucoMen®Day: a novel microdialysis-based continuous glucose monitor. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Sep 1;4(5):1182-92. PMID: 20920438.
Measurements from the DexCom Seven Plus are compared to those from the Menarini GlucoMen Day, though not in a formal validation.
Herrington SJ, Gee DL, Dow SD, Monosky KA, Davis E, Pritchett KL. Comparison of glucose monitoring methods during steady-state exercise in women. Nutrients. 2012 Sep;4(9):1282-92. Epub: 2012 Sep 14. doi: 10.3390/nu4091282. PMID: 23112916.
Comparisons, in 12 non-diabetic women during intensity cycling and recovery, to venous plasma and capillary plasma (Ascensia Contour) glucose. Authors conclude inconsistent results with further research required.