Accuracy Assessment | Recommendation | Basis | |
BG | Medaval | ★★★ Recommendation | Recent clinical validation; recent protocol; multiple clinical validations |
BG | MDR Criteria | Self-measurement | Published evidence |
Tentolouris A, Eleftheriadou I, Grigoropoulou P, Nikoloudi M, Siami E, Tsilimigras DI, Tentolouris N. Accuracy and Usability Evaluation of Six Commercially Available Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2018 Jun;12(6):OC10-OC14. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2018/34055.11671. Available from: www.jcdr.net.
Ad Hoc protocol General population (Note: Tested in criteria resembling ISO 15197:2013.)
Pleus S, Baumstark A, Jendrike N, Mende J, Link M, Zschornack E, Haug C, Freckmann G. System accuracy evaluation of 18 CE-marked current-generation blood glucose monitoring systems based on EN ISO 15197:2015. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Jan;8(1):e001067. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001067. PMID: 31958308. Available from: drc.bmj.com.
15197:2013 - Pass General population (Note: Modified protocol: One reagent system lot. Also passes the more stringent criterion of at least 95% of values within ±10 mg/dL (0.56 mmol/L) or ±10% of the reference measurement procedure’s results.)
Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Jendrike N, Mende J, Schauer S, Link M, Pleus S, Haug C. Impact of Two Different Reference Measurement Procedures on Apparent System Accuracy of 18 CE-Marked Current-Generation Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Sep;16(5):1076-1088. Epub: 2020 Aug 19. doi: 10.1177/1932296820948873. PMID: 32814455. Available from: PMC9445332.
15197:2013 - Pass General population
15197:2013 - Pass General population