
Former: Atcor Medical, Unit 11, West Ryde Corporate Centre, 1059-1063 Victoria Rd, West Ryde, NSW 2114, AUSTRALIA.
Other: Cardiex Limited, Suite 301, 55 Lime St., Barangaroo 2000, Sydney, AUSTRALIA.
Accuracy Assessment | Recommendation | Basis | |
BP | Medaval | None | When an evaluation is carried out using a non-standard protocol, no inference can be made on accuracy based on a standard protocol. |
Zuo JL, Li Y, Yan ZJ, Zhang RY, Shen WF, Zhu DL, Gao PJ, Chu SL. Validation of the central blood pressure estimation by the SphygmoCor system in Chinese. Blood Press Monit. 2010 Oct;15(5):268-74. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283386866. PMID: 20357649.
Ad Hoc protocol General population (Note: IA study (n=45))
Ding FH, Fan WX, Zhang RY, Zhang Q, Li Y, Wang JG. Validation of the noninvasive assessment of central blood pressure by the SphygmoCor and Omron devices against the invasive catheter measurement. Am J Hypertens. 2011 Dec;24(12):1306-11. Epub: 2011 Oct 6. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2011.145. PMID: 21976274.
Ad Hoc protocol General population (Note: IA study (n=33))
Sharman JE, Lim R, Qasem AM, Coombes JS, Burgess MI, Franco J, Garrahy P, Wilkinson IB, Marwick TH. Validation of a generalized transfer function to noninvasively derive central blood pressure during exercise. Hypertension. 2006 Jun;47(6):1203-8. Epub: 2006 May 1. PMID: 16651459. Available from: hyper.ahajournals.org.
The publication describes the use of the AtCor Sphygmocor CP in a scientific study.
Baulmann J, Schillings U, Rickert S, Uen S, Düsing R, Illyes M, Cziraki A, Nickering G, Mengden T. A new oscillometric method for assessment of arterial stiffness: comparison with tonometric and piezo-electronic methods. J Hypertens. 2008 Mar;26(3):523-528. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f314f7. PMID: 18300864.
Reference device for validation of pulse wave velocity and augmentation index functions of the Tensiomed Arteriograph TL2.
Kips JG, Schutte AE, Vermeersch SJ, Huisman HW, Van Rooyen JM, Glyn MC, Fourie CM, Malan L, Schutte R, Van Bortel LM, Segers P. Comparison of central pressure estimates obtained from SphygmoCor, Omron HEM-9000AI and carotid applanation tonometry. J Hypertens. 2011 Jun;29(6):1115-20. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328346a3bc. PMID: 21505351.
Measurements from the AtCor Sphygmocor CP are compared to those from the Omron HEM-9000AI, though not in a formal validation.
Rezai MR, Goudot G, Winters C, Finn JD, Wu FC, Cruickshank JK. Calibration mode influences central blood pressure differences between SphygmoCor and two newer devices, the Arteriograph and Omron HEM-9000. Hypertens Res. 2011 Sep;34(9):1046-51. Epub: 2011 Jul 14. doi: 10.1038/hr.2011.75. PMID: 21753770. Available from: www.nature.com.
Measurements from the AtCor Sphygmocor CP are compared to those from the Omron M9000 and the Arteriograph, though not in a formal validation.
Ding FH, Li Y, Zhang RY, Zhang Q, Wang JG. Comparison of the SphygmoCor and Omron devices in the estimation of pressure amplification against the invasive catheter measurement. J Hypertens. 2013 Jan;31(1):86-93. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835a8eca. PMID: 23188416.
Measurements from the AtCor Sphygmocor CP are compared to those from the Omron HEM-9000AI, though not in a formal validation.
Agnoletti D, Millasseau S, Topouchian J, Safar ME, Blacher J. Comparison of central blood pressure devices on the basis of a modified protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: application to the Centron cBP301. Blood Press Monit. 2014 Apr;19(2):103-8. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000028. PMID: 24418970.
The publication describes the AtCor Sphygmocor CP being used as a reference device for comparison with the Centron cBP301.
Cuffaro PE, Morales MS, Barochiner J, Rada MA, Alfie J, Aparicio LS, Galarza CR, Micali RG, Marin MJ, Waisman GD. Validation of a new piezoelectric device for noninvasive measurement of central aortic systolic blood pressure. Blood Press Monit. 2018 Feb;23(1):49-51. Epub: 2017 Oct 27. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000298. PMID: 29084016.
The publication describes the AtCor Sphygmocor CP being used as a validation control device.