Accuracy Assessment | Recommendation | Basis | |
BG | Medaval | Not recommended | This device has failed a clinical validation. |
Ho HT, Yeung WK, Young BW. Evaluation of "point of care" devices in the measurement of low blood glucose in neonatal practice. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 Jul;89(4):F356-359. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.033548. PMID: 15210675. Available from: PMC1721720.
ADA:1994 - Fail Neonates (n = 44) (Note: Error < 10 %: 38.1 %)
CLSI:1994 - Fail Neonates (n = 44) (Note: Error ≤ 0.83 mmol/L: 85.7% (< 95 %))
Diaw CS, Piol N, Urfer J, Werner D, Roth-Kleiner M. Prospective evaluation of three point of care devices for glycemia measurement in a neonatal intensive care unit. Clin Chim Acta. 2013 Oct 21;425:104-8. Epub: 2013 Jul 29. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.07.021. PMID: 23906797.
15197:2011 - Fail Neonates
15197:2003 - Fail Neonates
Roth-Kleiner M, Stadelmann Diaw C, Urfer J, Ruffieux C, Werner D. Evaluation of different POCT devices for glucose measurement in a clinical neonatal setting. Eur J Pediatr. 2010 Nov;169(11):1387-95. Epub: 2010 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s00431-010-1243-2. PMID: 20574734.
Retrospective study with ISO 15197:2003 criteria applied to results, on neonates, recorded over 1 year. The authors claim that the device tended to overestimate glycaemia values; however the application of protocol criteria is dependent on the protocol procedure being followed precisely.