data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8ef2/d8ef21db0b70d1c2328c533b821d95a4b24d72ff" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a884/7a88474f9544b95a13e3695482a5a5f1b2d205d1" alt=""
Accuracy Assessment | Recommendation | Basis | |
BG | Medaval | None | When an evaluation is carried out using a non-standard protocol, no inference can be made on accuracy based on a standard protocol. |
Thomas LE, Kane MP, Bakst G, Busch RS, Hamilton RA, Abelseth JM. A glucose meter accuracy and precision comparison: the FreeStyle Flash Versus the Accu-Chek Advantage, Accu-Chek Compact Plus, Ascensia Contour, and the BD Logic. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Apr;10(2):102-110. doi: 10.1089/dia.2007.0244. PMID: 18260773.
Ad Hoc protocol General population
Ad Hoc protocol General population
Simmons DA. Comments on evaluation of five glucose meters by Thomas et al. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Oct;10(5):415. Epub: 2008 Aug 21. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0056. PMID: 18715220.
The publication is a letter or correspondence in which the Abbott FreeStyle Flash is referenced.
Kane MP, Hamilton RA. Response to Simmons. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Oct;10(5):417. Epub: 2008 Aug 21. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0059.
The publication is a letter or correspondence in which the Abbott FreeStyle Flash is referenced.