Accuracy Assessment | Recommendation | Basis | |
BP | Medaval | None | When an evaluation is carried out using a non-standard protocol, no inference can be made on accuracy based on a standard protocol. |
Carlsen JE, Køber L, Hansen AD, Sinding A, Andersen P. Elektronisk blodtryksmåling. En teknisk og klinisk vurdering af Takeda Medical UA 751. [Electronic blood pressure determination. A technical and clinical evaluation of Takeda Medical UA 751.] Ugeskr Laeger. 1988 May 23;150(21):1280-2. PMID: 3381323. In Danish.
Unknown protocol General population (Note: No abstract online)
Johnston DW, Shah D. An evaluation of the Takeda UA751 automatic sphygmomanometer. Behav Res Ther. 1989;27(2):203-4. PMID: 2930447.
Ad Hoc protocol General population
Harrison DW, Crews WD Jr. The Takeda Model UA-751 blood pressure and pulse rate monitor. Biomed Instrum Technol. 1992 Jul-Aug;26(4):325-7. PMID: 1393203.
Ad Hoc protocol General population
Cartwright C, Unwin N, Stephenson P. Agreement between the Takeda UA-731 automatic blood pressure measuring device and the manual mercury sphygmomanometer: an assessment under field conditions in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Apr;50(2):218-22. PMID: 8762392.
Ad Hoc protocol Women (n=71)
Ad Hoc protocol Women (n=71)
Cartwright C, Unwin N, Stephenson P. Agreement between the Takeda UA-731 automatic blood pressure measuring device and the manual mercury sphygmomanometer: an assessment under field conditions in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Apr;50(2):218-22. PMID: 8762392.
Ad Hoc protocol Women (n=71)
Ad Hoc protocol Women (n=71)